In an interview accompanying his selection as Time's Person of the Year, Trump stated that he strongly disagrees with sending missiles hundreds of miles into Russia, asking, "Why are we doing this?".
This is reported by The Guardian. Trump appears to advocate for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict. This perspective reflects not only Trump's views but also those of his allies in Congress, such as Senator Mike Lee, who warns that U.S. supplies of Atacms missiles to Ukraine could lead to a global conflict.
"As Trump is inclined to seek a resolution in Ukraine through negotiations, he seems to want to close off avenues that Russia might use to avoid participating in talks," the article states.
While Trump's opposition to the use of Atacms is quite expected, it also carries hidden risks. With the UK and France approving long-range missile strikes against Russian targets, Trump's position undermines the credibility of military cooperation within NATO regarding the war in Ukraine.
Another significant aspect is Russia's recent defeat in the Middle East. Russia's withdrawal from its strategic positions in Syria and its capitulation amid advances by militants against Bashar Assad clearly demonstrated the limitations of Russian capabilities. This could serve as a warning to the Kremlin and a reminder to the West that Russia has finite resources.
Trump's plan to end the wars that have claimed countless lives in Ukraine and the Middle East is commendable. "Peace through strength" is the most effective way to make this a reality, the publication writes.
Source: telegraph.